Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 N.M. 110 - March v. State

March v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably State v. Freed (1996), State v. Aragon (1990)

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

18019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. DiFrancesco · State v. Mayberry · State v. Baros · Lott v. Cox · State v. Cheadle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he court has authority to correct an irregular sentence at any time prior to when defendant has served his full sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[s]entencing may violate concepts of double jeopardy if not within objectively reasonable expectations of finality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.