Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 N.M. 668 - State v. Ruffins

State v. Ruffins’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably State v. Orgain (1993), Wolford v. Lasater (1996)

2 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

180199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3013

Relies on State v. Brown · Security Escrow Corp. v. State of Taxation & Revenue Department · State v. Aubrey · United States v. Mayberry · State v. Lopez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Forgery consists of: A. falsely making or altering any signature to, or any part of, any writing purporting to have any legal efficacy with intent to injure or defraud; or B. knowingly issuing or transferring a forged writing with intent to injure or defraud. Whoever commits forgery is guilty of a third degree felony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “possessing the requisite intent: (1) falsely makes or alters a writing which purports to have legal efficacy; (2) physically delivers a forged writing; or (3) passes an interest in a forged writing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When a statute does not define its terms, general rules of statutory construction dictate that we interpret those terms in the common, ordinary sense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.