Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 N.M. 752 - State v. Brazeal

State v. Brazeal’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably State v. Chamberlain (1991), State v. Hernandez (1993)

60 state decisions

2201990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Chambers v. Maroney · United States v. Cronic · Ungar v. Sarafite

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]ppellate courts will not presume denial of effective assistance of counsel because of the trial judge’s refusal to grant a continuance unless, under the circumstances, “the likelihood that any lawyer, even a fully competent one, could provide effective assistance is so small that a presumption of prejudice is appropriate without inquiry into the actual conduct of the trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““[A] court need not determine whether counsel’s performance was deficient before examining the prejudice suffered by the defendant as a result of the alleged deficiencies * * *. If it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, which we expect will often be so, that course should be followed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.