Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 N.M. 789 - State v. Jonathan M.

State v. Jonathan M.’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

130
cited by 130 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

126 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 130 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State Ex Rel. Helman v. Gallegos (1994), Sims v. Sims (1996)

126 state decisions

560199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pitts · Storey v. University of New Mexico Hospital/BCMC · State v. Favela · New Mexico Beverage Co. v. Blything · State v. Michael R.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 130 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a statute contains language which is clear and unambiguous, we must give effect to that language and refrain from further statutory interpretation.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the public interest, to remove from children committing delinquent acts the adult consequences of criminal behavior, but to still hold children ... accountable for their actions to the extent of the child's age, education, mental and physical condition, background and all other relevant factors, and to provide a program of supervision, care and rehabilitation....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The Children’s Code ... shall be interpreted and construed to effectuate the following legislative purposes: B. [T]o provide judicial and other procedures through which the provisions of the Children’s Code are executed and enforced and in which the parties are assured a fair hearing and them constitutional and other legal rights are recognized and enforced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.