Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 Ohio App. 3d 13 - Bratton v. Frederick

109 Ohio App. 3d 13 - Bratton v. Frederick’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Long v. Calhoun · Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald · 88 Ohio App. 3d 296 - Dozer v. Dozer · Barnett v. Barnett · Holtz v. Poe (In Re Poe)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “State and federal courts have concurrent jurisdiction to determine whether debts are nondischargeable under Section 523(a)(5). Barnett v. Barnett (1984), 9 Ohio St.3d 47 , 49 , 9 OBR 165 , 166-167 , 458 N.E.2d 834 , 836 . While *Page 11 federal law in this area is controlling, state law may be used as a source of guidance in developing federal standards for determining the nature of the debt and the applicability of the Section 523(a)(5). Id.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.