109 Ohio App. 3d 830 - Casey v. Casey’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2012
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · 59 Ohio St. 3d 108 - Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd. · Flowers v. Walker · Doe v. First United Methodist Church · State v. Chapin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact exist for reasonable minds to find that the doctrine of equitable estoppel barrs [sic] defendant from the benefit of the statute of limitations.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“plaintiff must present some evidence of [her] state of mind at the time the cause of action accrued in order to satisfy the first paragraph.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.