State v. Beasley’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Great State Beverages, Inc. v. Wenners · Attwood v. Singletary · City of El Centro v. United States · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t] o restrict a person’s movements without consent and without legal authority in a manner which interferes substantially with his liberty. Restraint is without consent if it is accomplished by (a) physical force, intimidation, or deception, or (b) any means including acquiescence of the victim, if he is a child less than sixteen years old or an incompetent person and if the parent, guardian, or other person or institution having lawful control or custody of him has not acquiesced.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“A person is guilty of unlawful imprisonment if he knowingly restrains another person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.