Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 Pa. Super. 28 - Tamres v. Reed

109 Pa. Super. 28 - Tamres v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
June 1990
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 1990

7 state decisions

401933194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co. · Delahunt v. United Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Burke v. Kennedy · Lyttle v. Denny

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial judge is not bound to remould [sic] points for charge presented to him. If they are not strictly in accordance with the facts in evidence or the law of the case, he may refuse them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.