Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 S.C. 52 - State v. Waring

State v. Waring’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1986
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1986

4 state decisions

2019181920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court of sessions is a court of general jurisdiction, and all things are presumed as to the regularity of the proceedings. We must therefore presume that when the clerk read the writing on the indictment he asked the jury, ‘And this is your verdict, so say ye all.’ The case does not show that any juror replied in the negative, or in any way expressed a dissent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.