Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 SO2D 418 - Spadaro v. Palmisano

Spadaro v. Palmisano’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
August 1994
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 1994

8 state decisions

4019591960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hill v. West End Street Railway Co. · Newman v. Stocker · Horneman v. Brown · Crothers v. Caroselli · Friedman v. Berkowitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he attorney-client relationship requires the utmost in fiduciary trust, even though this relationship might be an incident of an insurance contract. Fortunately, collusive suits are rare; however, when they do occur, or when there is reason to believe that such is being attempted, it is not proper for counsel to continue to represent both parties. Counsel is then torn between his obligations to two clients who have conflicting interests. The Biblical mandate that "No man can serve two masters" has its modern-day application in cases of this nature. See Canon 6, Canons of Professional Ethics, 31 F.S.A.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he issue of fraud and collusion injected into the trial not only intended to, but did, prejudice the [defendant] in the minds of the jury and caused its attention to be focused upon issues not covered by the pleadings. [ Spadaro, supra, 109 So. 2d at 421-22 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.