109 So. 2d 7 - Singer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 163 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 169 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2018 · most notably Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), 446 So. 2d 1038 - Lusk v. State (1984)
2 federal appellate · 163 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McNabb v. United States · Mallory v. United States · Reynolds v. States · United States v. Mitchell · Crooker v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 169 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f there is basis for any reasonable doubt as to any juror's possessing that state of mind which will enable him to render an impartial verdict based solely on the evidence submitted and the law announced at the trial he should be excused on motion of a party, or by the court on its own motion.”
23 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bryant v. State · Cook v. State“[A] juror's statement that he can and will return a verdict according to the evidence submitted and the law announced at the trial is not determinative of his competence, if it appears from other statements made by him or from other evidence that he is not possessed of a state of mind which will enable him to do so.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lewis v. State · Darr v. State“a juror is taken upon a trial whose mind is in such condition that the accused must produce evidence of his innocence to avoid a conviction.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.