Westbrook v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 208 So. 2d 886 - Carr v. State · 290 So. 2d 625 - Shanklin v. State · 680 So. 2d 225 - Ex Parte Register · 994 So. 2d 748 - Derouen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]cts testified to by ... Newton are acts relating to charges for which the [D]efendant is not presently on trial and are to be considered only for the limited purpose of showing proof of motive, intent, preparation, or plan. You cannot and must not simply infer that the [D]efendant acted in conformity with his previous acts and that he is therefore guilty of the charges for which he is presently on trial. [ 3 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to prove ... motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, [or] absence of mistake or accident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.