109 So. 3d 966 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville · 796 So. 2d 649 - State v. Neal · 450 So. 2d 938 - State v. Vessell · State v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“InWhen reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard , enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Under this standard, the appellate court “must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact- that all of - the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Neal, 00-0674, (La.6/29/01) 796 So.2d 649, 657 (citing State v. Captville, 448 So.2d 676, 678 (La.1984)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.