Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 SW2D 359 - Evans v. Moore

Evans v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1958
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1958

4 state decisions

20193719401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hovey v. Shepherd · Pure Oil Co. v. Reece · Snyder v. Nunn · Houston Oil Co. of Tex. v. v. M. Co. · Conley v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * when we affirmed that judgment, it became the judgment of this court, and it cannot be denied that Courts of Civil Appeals have the power, and that it is their duty, to stay any act whjch interferes with the enforcement of such decrees. Article 1823, Rev.Civ.Statutes; Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Village Mills Co., 123 Tex. 253 , 71 S.W.2d 1087, 1089 . “The duty of this court to protect its judgments does not require it to wait until some physical act or obstacle is placed as a barrier before those whose duty it is to execute its mandates, but may be exercised when a suit has been instituted in any court which may result in its defeat.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.