Hampton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
53 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Green v. United States · Almanza v. State · National Educational Support Systems, Inc. v. Autoskill, Inc. · Schlossberg v. Maryland Comptroller of the Treasury · Wesbrook v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n determining whether the second prong has been met, it is not enough that the jury may disbelieve crucial evidence pertaining to the greater offense, but rather, there must be some evidence directly germane to the lesser-included offense for the finder of fact to consider before an instruction on a lesser-included offense is warranted.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“such affirmative evidence regarding the absence of evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re AEB
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.