Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 Tex. 1 - Dillingham, Receiver v. Putnam

Dillingham, Receiver v. Putnam’s Empirical Analysis

1890

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2010 · most notably Pennzoil Company v. Texaco Inc (1987), Nelson v. Krusen (1984)

3 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

2001890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All courts shall be open; and every person for an injury done him, in his lands, goods, person or reputation, shall have remedy by due course of law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.