Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 Tex. 237 - Baker v. Pitluk & Meyer

Baker v. Pitluk & Meyer’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
August 1976
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 1976

17 state decisions

1001918192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no order or decree [quoting] foreclosing the lien thereby acquired shall be necessary, but the judgment shall briefly recite the issuance and levy of such attachment, and such recital shall be sufficient to preserve such lien. The land so attached may be sold under execution after judgment, and the sale thereof shall vest in the purchaser all the estate of the defendant in attachment in such land, at the time of the levy of such writ of attachment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When an attachment issued from a county or justice court has been levied upon land, no order or decree foreclosing the lien thereby acquired shall be necessary, but the judgment shall briefly recite the issuance and levy of such attachment, and such recital shall be sufficient to preserve such lien.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The power to foreclose an attachment lien on land or personalty is embraced in the power to render a personal judgment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.