Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 Vt. 99 - Hall v. Royce

Hall v. Royce’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
September 1990
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1990 · most notably Conway v. O'Brien (1941), Crawford v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company (1966)

8 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

901937194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on King v. Viscoloid Co. · Tyrrell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America · Shiels v. Audette · Hatch v. Daniels · Shaw, Admr. v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““So far as the defendant Royce is concerned, it is quite apparent that the suit must fail, unless there was evidence fairly and reasonably tending to show that she was grossly or wilfully careless. For of such, alone, consists the right of action of a gratuitous guest. P. L. 5113. Nor does her father stand any better here, for his right of action, if he has any, while independent of hers, in some respects, see King v. Viscoloid Co., 219 Mass. 420 ( 106 N. E. 988 , Ann. Cas. 1916D, 1170), is founded upon the same breach of duty as that sued on by the minor. And if the latter cannot recover the parent cannot. Thompson v. United Laboratories Co., 221 Mass. 276 ( 108 N. E. 1042 , 1043); Regan v. Superb Theatre, Inc., 220 Mass. 259 ( 107 N. E. 984 ); Central Ga. R. Co. v. Robins, 209 Ala. 12 ( 95 South. 370 ); Callies v. Reliance Laundry Co., 188 Wis. 376 ( 206 N. W. 198 , 42 A. L. R. 712, 715); Shiels v. Audette, 119 Conn. 75 ( 174 Atl. 323 , 94 A. L. R. 1206, 1208), and note.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.