Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 Wash. 2d 29 - State v. Stannard

109 Wash. 2d 29 - State v. Stannard’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
1
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

86 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably 114 Wash. 2d 828 - State v. Fjermestad (1990), 116 Wash. 2d 794 - Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (1991)

86 state decisions

38019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · California v. Trombetta · 87 Wash. 2d 783 - State v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Statutes should be construed to effect their purpose and unlikely, absurd or strained consequences should be avoided.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The officer shall inform the person of his or her right to refuse the breath or blood test, and of his or her right to have additional tests administered by any qualified person of his or her choosing as provided in RCW 46.61.506. The officer shall warn the driver that (a) his or her privilege to drive will be revoked or denied if he or she refuses to submit to the test, and (b) that his or her refusal to take the test may be used in a criminal trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “to obtain evidence with which to impeach the results of the state-administered test.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.