State v. Vasquez’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Hernandez, do you need time to talk to your client, then? MR. HERNANDEZ [Counsel for Mr. Vasquez]: No. I think that's fine. We are ready to go. THE COURT: Meaning? MR. HERNANDEZ: Waiving the jury. THE COURT: He desires to waive the jury? MR. HERNANDEZ: Yes, sir. THE COURT: Mr. Vasquez, do you know what it means to waive a jury? THE DEFENDANT: No. THE COURT: Okay. It means that you would have a trial in front of me, in front of the Judge, and the jury wouldn't decide your guilt or innocence. Do you understand that? THE DEFENDANT: Okay. THE COURT: What do you want? You have a right to a jury trial. Do you desire to give up that right to a jury trial?”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. State v. Vasquez

2. “at the administrative level); State v. Gusman, 125 Idaho 810 , 874 P.2d 1117 (1993) (court, applying public policy, refused to bind criminal proceeding to administrative decision that police lacked probable cause to stop the defendant), aff'd, 125 Idaho 805 , 874 P.2d 1112 (1994); State v. Young, 249 Neb. 539 , 544 N.W.2d 808, 813 (1996) (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Vasquez