Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 Wis. 2d 138 - State v. Monje

109 Wis. 2d 138 - State v. Monje’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently August 2007 · most notably 131 Wis. 2d 220 - State v. Smith (1986), 205 Wis. 2d 675 - State Ex Rel. Rothering v. Mc Caughtry (1996)

40 state decisions

290198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gerstein v. Pugh · Frisbie v. Collins · United States v. Crews · Ker v. People of the State of Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “personal jurisdiction is dependent upon the defendant's physical presence before the court pursuant to a properly issued warrant, a lawful arrest or a voluntary appearance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Washington · 131 Wis. 2d 220 - State v. Smith
  2. “The defendant shall file an appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence and, if necessary, from the order of the trial court on the motion for post-conviction relief within 20 days of the entry of the order on the post-conviction motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 152 Wis. 2d 200 - State v. Louis
  3. “that for issues on appeal to be considered as a matter of right, postconviction motions must be made except in challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence under sec. 974.02(2) [Stats. (1979-80)].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 167 Wis. 2d 423 - State v. Hayes

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.