Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 109 Wis. 2d 204 - State v. Bauer

109 Wis. 2d 204 - State v. Bauer’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
2
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably 124 Wis. 2d 681 - State v. Wyss (1985), 110 Wis. 2d 555 - State v. Armstrong (1983)

2 federal appellate · 79 state decisions

4701982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Chambers v. Mississippi · Pointer v. Texas · California v. Green · Dutton v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the trier of fact has a reasonable basis for evaluating the truthfulness of the prior statement.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 138 Wis. 2d 418 - State v. Nelson · 113 Wis. 2d 643 - State v. Marshall
  2. “(1) Former Testimony. Testimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, or in a deposition taken in compliance with law in the course of another proceeding, at the instance of or against a party with an opportunity to develop the testimony by direct, cross-, or redirect examination, with motive and interest similar to those of the party against whom now offered.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 139 Wis. 2d 312 - State v. Drusch · 194 Wis. 2d 79 - State v. Marks
  3. “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to be confronted with the witnesses against him.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Glenn T. Zamzow · 138 Wis. 2d 418 - State v. Nelson

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.