Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 A.3d 97 - State v. Snell

State v. Snell’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ballard · State v. Mendoza · Curtis v. State · State v. Ruffner · State v. Snell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This Court has maintained a ‘strong policy against interfering with a trial justice’s discretion in sentencing matters,’ and, therefore, we only will interfere with that discretion ‘in rare instances when the trial justice has imposed a sentence that is without justification and is grossly disparate from other sentences generally imposed for similar offenses.’ ” Id. (quoting State v. Coleman, 984 A.2d 650, 654 (R.I.2009)).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial justice, who may grant it if he or she decides on reflection or on the basis of changed circumstances that the sentence originally imposed was, for any reason, unduly severe.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “well within his discretion to give and then confirm the instant punishment for [defendant.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.