11 Ariz. App. 285 - Rexing v. Rexing’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Clearly the purpose of the five day delay required by Rule 58(d) is to enable the losing party to present for determination by the court that party’s objections to the contents of a judgment proposed by the successful party. We believe that this purpose is adequately served by allowing objections to the form of judgment initially proposed, and that Rule 58(d) does not require that a party be given the opportunity to object to the form of a revised judgment which is the result of the court’s ruling on the same party’s objections to the initially proposed judgment. We therefore hold that appellant was afforded the complete benefit of Rule 58(d). She had a full hearing on the merits of her'objections to the proposed form of judgment and the trial court was not required to give her another such opportunity.” 11 Ariz.App. at 287 , 464 P.2d at 358 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 20 Ariz. App. 220 - Reid v. Reid

2. “After trial to the court, the judge advised counsel for the plaintiff husband (appellee herein) to prepare a formal written decree. Thereafter, that decree was lodged with the court and with appellant's attorney.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In RE MARRIAGE OF REEDER v. Johnson