Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 Ariz. App. 457 - State v. Miller

11 Ariz. App. 457 - State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 1972
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Kercheval v. United States · State v. Griswold · 6 Ariz. App. 196 - Application of Buccheri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * However, assuming it does apply, we believe its mandates have been met here. We read Boykin to mean that when accepting a plea of guilty, a trial court must make a record of inquiry as to the intelligence of the plea. There is no requirement that, in addition he makes a specific finding of voluntariness other than that implied by ultimately taking the plea. In the instant case, the record is clear that defendant was making an intelligent waiver.” State v. Miller, 11 Ariz.App. 457, 458 , 465 P.2d 594, 595 (1970).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.