Sands v. Stombaugh’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2016
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bunny Bread v. Shipman · 2 Ark. App. 185 - OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES, ETC. v. Home Ins. Co. · Sandy v. Salter · 5 Ark. App. 264 - Franklin v. Arkansas Kraft, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the right to control the means and the method by which the work is done; (2) the right to terminate the employ^ ment without liability; (3) the method of payment, whether by time, job, piece or other unit ofmeasurement; (4) the furnishing, or the obligation to furnish, the necessary tools-, equipment and materials; (5) whether the person employed is engaged in a distinct occupation or business; (6) the skill required in a particular occupation; (7) whether the employer is in business; (8) whether the work is an integral part of the regular business of the employer; and (9) the length of time for which the person is employed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.