¶1By the Court,
¶2We are of opinion the demurrer can not be sustained, for the reason that although by the commercial law such paper is negotiable, and negotiated by indorsement only, yet it has been holden, before the code, that the property in the note passes by actual delivery, and that the owner may sue, in the name of the payee, for his own benefit. (10 B. & C. 122. Chit. on Bills, 204. 13 Mass. Rep. 305.)
¶3The code, by the 111th section, has now made it proper, and indeed necessary, to sue in the name of the actual owner, or real party in interest. Here the plaintiff is the actual owner, and real party in interest, of the note sued on. He purchased it for a valuable consideration, and took the actual delivery of it from the payee and former owner.
¶4Whether the plaintiff is protected from a set-off or other defense which the defendant may have against Fenno, within the protection given to assignees in good faith, by the last clause of section 112, it is not necessary now to decide.
¶5The demurrer is overruled, and judgment ordered for the plaintiff, unless the defendant answers in twenty days, on payment of costs of this demurrer.