Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 CAL 21 - Turner v. Morrison

Turner v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis

1858

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
February 1986
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 1986

9 state decisions

3018581860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The parties,' says Judge Kent, in Alexander v. Bryan, (2 John. Cas., 318) 'must come to trial prepared, at their peril, and if either party has any good excuse for not being prepared, he is entitled of right to a postponement of the trial. It has, therefore, been repeatedly held, that the subsequent allegation of a party that he was not prepared, is no reason for granting a new trial, unless it be founded on the discovery of testimony of which the party was not at the time apprised.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “By failing to apply for a postponement of the trial, plaintiffs waived their right to move for a new trial for reasons which existed at the time of the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.