11 Cal. 3d 331 - Diamond v. Bland’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
77 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2014 · most notably PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins (1980), 23 Cal. 3d 899 - Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center (1979)
77 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Marsh v. State of Alabama · Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner · Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc. · 67 Cal. 2d 845 - In Re Hoffman · 3 Cal. 3d 653 - Diamond v. Bland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court distinguished Logan on the basis that, unlike the situation in that case, the handbilling had no relation to any purpose for which the shopping center was being used, [fn. 3] and that respondents had adequate alternative avenues to disseminate their views by distributing the material on the public streets and sidewalks, including those surrounding the shopping center.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“labor unions had a labor dispute with, and were picketing, businesses located within the shopping centers ... a factor which led us to strike the balance between private property rights and First Amendment activities in favor of the latter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[u]nder these circumstances, we must conclude that defendants' private property interests outweigh plaintiffs' own interests in exercising First Amendment rights in the manner sought herein.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.