11 Cal. App. 253 - Smith v. Sinbad Development Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 1911
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co. · American Type Founders' Co. v. Packer · Cohen v. City of Alameda · Carpentier v. Small · Hartson v. Hardin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is due G-. L. Smith, for services performed for the Sinbad Development Company, in accordance with terms of hiring, 3 mos, at $225 per mo. & expenses, $675 Expenses paid out by Smith, 75 “Dated Nov. 30, 1907. “(Signed) F. G. DOWNEY, “See. & General Manager of Sinbad Development Co.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.