People v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2 Cal. 4th 870 - People v. Raley · 43 Cal. 4th 327 - People v. Zamudio · 19 Cal. 4th 301 - People v. Davis · 34 Cal. 4th 821 - People v. Combs · MacK v. Armstrong
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Neither the Attorney General nor [the defendant] discuss the statute's legislative history. After conducting our own review, we conclude the Legislature intended the result the Attorney General characterizes as 'absurd' or 'inconsistent.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.