On the 29th day of April, 1882, the defendant, William Barth, conveyed, by special warranty deed, certain premises to the plaintiff, Sarah J. Deuel. In consideration of such conveyance the plaintiff paid to defendant $1,500 cash down, and gave him fifteen promissory notes for $200 each, with interest at one per cent, per month, and made a trust-deed on the premises to secure said notes.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1888-04-15
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2009
1 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶1I concur in all respects, except as to the propriety and effect of the decree directed. I regard the trustee as a necessary party, in order that the decree may do full justice to all the parties,— place them in statu quo.
Per Curiam.
¶2For the reasons assigned in the foregoing opinion the judgment is reversed, with directions to enter a decree in accordance with the foregoing opinion.