Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 COLOAPP 211 - Seaton v. Tohill

Seaton v. Tohill’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2002

10 state decisions

20189819001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cole v. Superior Court · Lloyd v. Kirkwood · Rhoads v. Rhoads · Turner v. Jenkins · Oliver v. Houdlet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “exercise a watchful and protecting care over [a minor's] interests, and not permit his rights to be waived, prejudiced or surrendered either by his own acts, or by the admissions or pleadings of those who act for him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.