Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 E.H. Smith 281 - Canda v. . Totten

11 E.H. Smith 281 - Canda v. . Totten’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
states following
February 1989
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently February 1989 · most notably Burns v. . McCormick (1922), Woolley v. . Stewart (1918)

38 state decisions

1501898190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ryan v. . Dox · Wheeler v. . Reynolds · Levy v. . Brush · Lathrop v. Hoyt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “equity will not permit the statute of frauds to be made an instrument of fraud”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.