United States v. Wentworth & O'Neil’s Empirical Analysis
11 F. 52 · 1882
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1994
8 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Holliday · State v. Gove · Union Canal Co. v. Young · Commonwealth v. Houghton · Krider v. Lafferty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“which the statute makes an offence, and this is forgery as described in all the elementary books. 9 See also Greathouse v. United States, 170 F.2d 512, 514 (4th Cir.1948) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.