Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 F.2d 244 - Thompson v. Hays

Thompson v. Hays’s Empirical Analysis

11 F.2d 244 · 1926

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
October 1972
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 1972

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

30192619301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Potter v. United States · Felton v. United States · Wylie v. Bushnell · Kline's Estate · Warren v. Pazolt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It means more than involuntary, inadvertent, negligent, mistaken, careless, or accidental default. It means an intentional designing failure to do or not to do something required — an affirmative wrong. Van Sielen v. Bartol et al. (C.C.) 95 F. 793 ; In re Mallon’s Estate, 89 N.Y.S. 554 , 43 Misc. Rep. 569 ; Winslow Warren and Others, Trustees, v. Elizabeth B. Pazolt and Others, 89 N. E. 381 , 203 Mass. 328 . * * * “It is doubtless true that a trustee may be guilty of such wanton or willful neglect of his duties, such reckless indifference to and disregard of the interests and rights of the beneficiary, that the law will hold him guilty of a ‘willful default.’ Henry L. Doherty & Co. v. Rice et al. (C.C.) 186 F. 204 ; Kessler & Co. et al. v. Ensley Co. et al. (C.C.) 129 F. 397 .” Id. at 248.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.