Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 F.2d 345 - Schlieder v. United States

Schlieder v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

11 F.2d 345 · 1926

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 1931
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Lawton v. Steele · Denapolis v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The fundamental principle upon which section 22 depends for its validity is that it is intended to authorize the abatement of a nuisance by a suit in equity and to go no further.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.