Waldes v. Schall

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1926.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1926-01-15

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1945

1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Waldes v. Schall

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1926-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from final decree in equity entered in the District Court for the Southern District of New York.

¶2Burnstine & Geist, of New York City (Julius M. Mayer, Henry C. Burnstine, and Frederick P. Warfield, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

¶3Avery & Whiting, of New York City (Jay E. Whiting and Earl B. Barnes, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellees,

¶4HOUGH, MANTON and HAND, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6We are entirely satisfied with the findings of fact made by the master. They dispose of the ease, and decree [11 F.(2d) 444] is affirmed, with costs, on the master’s opimon.