Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 F.2d 55 - Elman v. Moller

Elman v. Moller’s Empirical Analysis

11 F.2d 55 · 1926

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
November 1967
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1967

8 federal appellate · 1 district ·

4019261930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “courts should act promptly and vigorously to vindicate all the rights of seamen, as well those recently conferred on them, as those which date from time immemorial. We doubt not that even now they will often need all the protection that can be given them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.