Franz v. Buder’s Empirical Analysis
11 F.2d 854 · 1926
Citation profile
40 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1968 · most notably Missouri v. Fiske (1933), 44 Cal. 2d 574 - Bowles v. Superior Court (1955)
40 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kline v. Burke Construction Co. · William Shields v. Robert R Barrow · Arndt v. Griggs · Barney v. Baltimore City · Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This suit concerns the title to and ownership of certain specific property alleged to be in the hands of the trustees in the city of St. Louis, and within the jurisdiction of the District Court, and involves the potential necessity of assuming control of that property for the purpose of enforcing any decree that may be rendered, and of preventing any disposition of the property that may impair the efficacy of that decree.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Franz v. Franz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.