Manson’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (1995), Scholes v. Lehmann (1995)
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation · Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pemberton · Reading Co. v. Schweitzer · Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A shareholder generally does not have standing to bring an individual action under RICO to redress injuries to the corporation in which he owns stock.... Since the shareholder’s injury, like that of the creditor, generally is derivative of the injury to the corporation, the shareholder’s injury is not related directly to the defendant’s injurious conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“direct purpose of insulating the corporation from its creditors.” Id.; see also Bankers Trust Co. v. Rhoades, 859 F.2d 1096, 1100-01 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1007 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 1643, 104 L.Ed.2d 158 (1989). Shareholders may sue when they”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kaiser v. Stewart“The creditor generally sustains injury only because he has a claim against the corporation. The creditor's injury is derivative of that of the corporation and is not caused proximately by the RICO violations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.