Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 F.3d 1284 - Enplanar, Inc. v. Marsh

Enplanar, Inc. v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis

11 F.3d 1284 · 1994

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Turner v. Baylor Richardson Medical Center (2007), Johnson v. Rodriguez (1997)

15 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

2801994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 634 · 15 U.S.C. § 637 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Edelman v. Jordan · Connick v. Myers · Butz v. Economou

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(i) requested extended discovery prior to the court’s ruling on summary judgment; (ii) placed the district court on notice that further discovery pertaining to the summary judgment motion was being sought; and (iii) demonstrated to the district court with reasonable specificity how the requested discovery pertained to the pending motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Judges are not like pigs, hunting for truffles buried in briefs.”). 6 . In response to the assertion that Plaintiff has no evidence of Mr. Bouffard’s or Mr. Oliver's knowing these statements were false when made, Plaintiff argues that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “in an effort to chill [prisoners'] access to the courts or to punish them for having brought suit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.