Waters v. Zant

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 22, 1993.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-12-22

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1999

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46

Relies on Waters v. Zant

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-12-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James M. Doyle, Deputy Chief Counsel, Public Counsel Div., the Com. of Mass., Committee for Public Counsel Services, Boston, MA and Wade W. Herring, II, Savannah, GA, for petitioner-appellant.

¶2Paula Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, GA, for respondent-appellee.

¶3Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, and CARNES, Circuit Judges.*

¶5BY THE COURT:

¶6A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for reheáring en banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶7IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc. The *140previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.