Steele v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
11 F.3d 1518 · 1993
Citation profile
70 federal appellate · 13 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 149 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Gff Corporation v. Associated Wholesale Grocers Inc (1997), Brecheen v. Reynolds (1994)
70 federal appellate · 13 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Haines v. Kerner · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Coleman v. Thompson · Teague v. Lane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 149 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On habeas review, we do not address issues that have been defaulted in state court on an independent and adequate state procedural ground, unless cause and prejudice or a fundamental miscarriage of justice is shown.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'supplements his constitutional claim with a colorable showing of factual innocence.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reyes v. Tansy · Hardeman v. Boone“'Cause' must be 'something external to the petitioner, something that cannot fairly be attributed to him....'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.