Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 F.3d 170 - Action for Children's Television v. Federal Communications Commission

Action for Children's Television v. Federal Communications Commission’s Empirical Analysis

11 F.3d 170 · 1993

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2014

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

120199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1464

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Gault · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Wisconsin v. Yoder · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he Commission[ ] ... appears to assume that, regardless of the time of day or night, parents cannot effectively supervise their children's television or radio habits. Accordingly, the government has not adduced any evidence suggesting that the effectiveness of parental supervision varies by time of day or night, or that the particular safe harbor from midnight to 6 a.m. was crafted to assist parents at specific times when they especially require the government's help to supervise their children.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629 , 639, 88 S.Ct. 1274, 1280, 20 L.Ed.2d 195 (1968). It is entirely reasonable for”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.