Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 F.3d 247 - Williams v. Jones

Williams v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

11 F.3d 247 · 1993

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2018

8 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

150199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 159 (§ 9 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 33 U.S.C. § 902 · 33 U.S.C. § 908 · 33 U.S.C. § 912 · 33 U.S.C. § 914 · 33 U.S.C. § 918 · 33 U.S.C. § 921

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Crowell v. Benson · Hecht Co. v. Bowles · Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo · Porter v. Warner Holding Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “first and only forum for a full hearing of such factual disputes prior to the issuance of an injunctive enforcement order, with its attendant exposure to coercive contempt proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to assert a defense of insufficient process or insufficient service of process. These defenses may be waived if not timely asserted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “by a necessary and inescapable inference [ ] restricts the court's jurisdiction in equity,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.