Jewelcor Incorporated v. Asia Commercial Company Ltd II’s Empirical Analysis
11 F.3d 394 · 1993
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably Weiss McGahren v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Company (1997), 408 F. App'x 639 - Huertas v. U.S. Department of Education (2010)
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Donnelly v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. · Tudor Development Group, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · Braniff Airways Inc International Brotherhood of Teamsters Hc Jm Ic v. Braniff Airways Inc · In Re Quevedo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The notice requirement is an integral part of limitations periods found throughout our rules of procedure and the bankruptcy code. Rule 8007 is no exception. As we will not condone an appellant’s dilatory tactics in filing an appeal, we will not hold an appellant accountable for a third party’s oversight that was beyond the appellant’s knowledge and control.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Without notice from the clerk of the district court, an appellant cannot be certain of the precise date on which the appeal was docketed. Given the extremely restricted time period in which the appellant is to file the brief, notice to the parties from the district court clerk is critical.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Id. at 399. 12 Jewelcor's author, Judge Aldisert, served as chairman of the Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules at the time Rules 8007 and 8009 were drafted. See id. at 398 n. 1. Judge Aldisert pointed out that while”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.