Qutb v. Strauss’s Empirical Analysis
11 F.3d 488 · 1993
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 2 district · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Hutchins v. District of Columbia (1999), Ramos v. Town of Vernon (2000)
21 federal appellate · 2 district · 30 state decisions — followed in 14 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Plyler v. Doe · Gregory v. Ashcroft · City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co. · Ginsberg v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a classification disadvantages a 'suspect class' or impinges upon a 'fundamental right,' the ordinance is subject to strict scrutiny.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the city was unable to provide precise data concerning the number of juveniles who commit crimes during curfew hours, or the number of juvenile victims of crimes committed during the curfew.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[f]ederal courts have always been reluctant to question the potential effectiveness of legislative remedies designed to address societal problems.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.