Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 F.3d 613 - Martin v. Parker

Martin v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

11 F.3d 613 · 1993

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably State v. Madrigal (2000), Rufus Washington v. Gerald Hofbauer (2000)

11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

150199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Stone v. Powell · Granberry v. Greer · Webster v. Reproductive Health Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Cases involving sexual abuse exert an almost irresistible pressure on the emotions of the bench and bar alike. Because such cases typically turn on the relative credibilities of the defendant and the prosecuting witness, however, a strict adherence to the rules of evidence and appropriate prosecu-torial conduct is required to ensure a fair trial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “This court grants habeas corpus relief for prosecutorial improprieties where the prosecutor's statements are so egregious as to render the entire trial 'fundamentally unfair.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.