Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 11 F.3d 691 - Harvey v. McCaughtry

Harvey v. McCaughtry’s Empirical Analysis

11 F.3d 691 · 1993

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2011

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

90199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · North Carolina v. Alford · Hill v. Lockhart · Henderson v. Morgan · Smith v. O'Grady

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) that counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness (the “performance” prong) and 2) that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different ... (i.e., that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense) (the “prejudice” prong).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] defendant who knowingly and intelligently waives his attorney's potential or actual conflict of interest may not, under any circumstances, later claim that such a conflict deprived him of his right to effective assistance of counsel.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.